Ranking product recommendations to optimize for a high click-through rate (CTR) or for high conversion, such as add-to-cart rate (ACR) and Order-Submit-Rate (OSR, view-to-purchase conversion) are standard practices in e-commerce. Optimizing for CTR appears like a straightforward choice: Training data (i.e., click data) are simple to collect and often available in large quantities. Additionally, CTR is used far beyond e-commerce, making it a generalist, easily implemented option. ACR and OSR, on the other hand, are more directly linked to a shop's business goals, such as the Gross Merchandise Value (GMV). In this paper, we compare the effects of using either of these objectives using an online A/B test. Among our key findings, we demonstrate that in our shops, optimizing for OSR produces a GMV uplift more than five times larger than when optimizing for CTR, without sacrificing new product discovery. Our results also provide insights into the different feature importances for each of the objectives.

We investigate the optimization target of Contrast-Consistent Search (CCS), which aims to recover the internal representations of truth of a large language model. We present a new loss function that we call the Midpoint-Displacement (MD) loss function. We demonstrate that for a certain hyper-parameter value this MD loss function leads to a prober with very similar weights to CCS. We further show that this hyper-parameter is not optimal and that with a better hyper-parameter the MD loss function attains a higher test accuracy than CCS.

Time series anomaly detection is crucial for industrial monitoring services that handle a large volume of data, aiming to ensure reliability and optimize system performance. Existing methods often require extensive labeled resources and manual parameter selection, highlighting the need for automation. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for automatic parameter optimization in time series anomaly detection models. The framework introduces three optimization targets: prediction score, shape score, and sensitivity score, which can be easily adapted to different model backbones without prior knowledge or manual labeling efforts. The proposed framework has been successfully applied online for over six months, serving more than 50,000 time series every minute. It simplifies the user's experience by requiring only an expected sensitive value, offering a user-friendly interface, and achieving desired detection results. Extensive evaluations conducted on public datasets and comparison with other methods further confirm the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

The current state-of-the-art in multi-objective optimization assumes either a given utility function, learns a utility function interactively or tries to determine the complete Pareto front, requiring a post elicitation of the preferred result. However, result elicitation in real world problems is often based on implicit and explicit expert knowledge, making it difficult to define a utility function, whereas interactive learning or post elicitation requires repeated and expensive expert involvement. To mitigate this, we learn a utility function offline, using expert knowledge by means of preference learning. In contrast to other works, we do not only use (pairwise) result preferences, but also coarse information about the utility function space. This enables us to improve the utility function estimate, especially when using very few results. Additionally, we model the occurring uncertainties in the utility function learning task and propagate them through the whole optimization chain. Our method to learn a utility function eliminates the need of repeated expert involvement while still leading to high-quality results. We show the sample efficiency and quality gains of the proposed method in 4 domains, especially in cases where the surrogate utility function is not able to exactly capture the true expert utility function. We also show that to obtain good results, it is important to consider the induced uncertainties and analyze the effect of biased samples, which is a common problem in real world domains.

The use of Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) has seen significant growth in the research community, industry, and society. Many of these agents are equipped with communication systems that are essential for completing certain tasks successfully. This has led to the emergence of a new interdisciplinary field at the intersection of robotics and communications, which has been further driven by the integration of UAVs into 5G and 6G communication networks. However, one of the main challenges in this research area is how many researchers tend to oversimplify either the robotics or the communications aspects, hindering the full potential of this new interdisciplinary field. In this paper, we present some of the necessary modeling tools for addressing these problems from both a robotics and communications perspective, using the UAV communications relay as an example.

The importance of ground Mobile Robots (MRs) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) within the research community, industry, and society is growing fast. Many of these agents are nowadays equipped with communication systems that are, in some cases, essential to successfully achieve certain tasks. In this context, we have begun to witness the development of a new interdisciplinary research field at the intersection of robotics and communications. This research field has been boosted by the intention of integrating UAVs within the 5G and 6G communication networks. This research will undoubtedly lead to many important applications in the near future. Nevertheless, one of the main obstacles to the development of this research area is that most researchers address these problems by oversimplifying either the robotics or the communications aspect. This impedes the ability of reaching the full potential of this new interdisciplinary research area. In this tutorial, we present some of the modelling tools necessary to address problems involving both robotics and communication from an interdisciplinary perspective. As an illustrative example of such problems, we focus in this tutorial on the issue of communication-aware trajectory planning.